Monday, September 27, 2010

Blog Training/Redelivery

Description: This field experience consisted of attending a blog training, redelivering the training to team members , presenting blogs and their use in the classroom to parents at PTA, and updating and maintaining a blog as a means of parental communication for my classroom.
Standards: TF-V.A – D (Productivity and Professional Practice)
Semester: Fall 2010
Hours: 5+ Hours (Blog Training on September 1 – 1 Hour, Redelivery to Team – 1 Hour, Preparation and Presentation to Parents – 1 Hour, Updating/Maintaining Classroom Blog – 2+ Hours)
Population: Redelivery – Fourth Grade Team Teachers, PTA Redelivery – Fourth Grade Parents
Reflection: This field experience gave me the opportunity to get some professional learning.  My school had not really implemented blog use before.  I created my own blog using Google Blogger for my classroom before, but the training was based on the district preferred blog.  I enjoyed the opportunity to learn about something new, but also share the information with my team.  Many of my team mates have created really outstanding blogs that are used regularly by their students and parents.  This experience was also important, because the parents were given the opportunity to learn about the blogs in the person at a PTA meeting.  I was able to present information on the blog using a projector; therefore, I could show the blogs from the internet and go through how to find a blog for each classroom step-by-step.  As the standards state, this experience allows me to apply technology to increase productivity.  Blogging is a very efficient tool for communicating with parents.  The students are impacted because they now have access to tools and information right from their computers at home.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

"Lipstick on a Bulldog"

As I dove into my reading from The Principal as Technology Leader, I flipped open my book and landed on this heading: Lipstick on a Bulldog.  I was instantly intrigued and, honestly, holding back from laughing out loud by the mental image in my head.  Initially, this metaphor (used by Rosebeth Moss Kanter) was used to point out that not all businesses are using technology as effectively and productively as they could be, but this metaphor transitions nicely into the Instructional Technology world as well.  Nowadays, schools think they are technology-advanced if they have a couple of computers in each classroom and wireless internet.  Sure, these things might look and sound great (hence the referene to the lipstick), but schools need more than the appropriate tools to be technology advanced.   So,  the lipstick doesn't really help the bulldog, because the problems are deeper than surface level.  For technology to be effective, educational leaders needs to be able to implement and plan technology effectively while remaining focused on standards-based instruction.  A good quote that really sums it up is "...effective integration of technology has more to do with teaching pedagogy, and very little to do with technology itself" (Creighton 1).  Technology is not just wires and computers!  It is about effective implementation.

In a school, where does effective technology implementation start...the leadership!  The principal in a school building must rally around the staff to determine how to use technology that will focus on the needs of the students and the teachers.  Principals need to look beyond the basic skills and needs that technology is used for.  Yes, Excel and Word are great tools for teacher, but there is so many more useful resources available and these programs should also be used as tools for the students.  For a principal to lead a successful technology program, they need to look at what's available in the school and combine that with effective instruction strategies.  They also need to be well-versed in the programs and tools they are buying or endorsing to be used by their staff.  The common theme in schools is that the principal has forgotten what it is truly like to be a classroom teacher.  The principal needs to work with their teachers to develop a plan that is realistic and focused on the actual needs of students.  Technology specialists can be brought in to schools to further supplement and answer questions where needed.  While principals might still be learning, technology specialists can often be considered the experts.

When developing a successful technology program, principals need to think about the "digital divide."  When I think about the "digital divide," I immediately think about the Matthew Effect (the rich get richer, the poor get poorer).  Initially when people think about the "digital divide," they probably think about the difference in the actual access to technology tools and materials.  Some kids have it and some kids don't.  While it might seem that all students have access to technology at school, if you look closer, it is clear that the type of technology use provided is dependent on several factors: gender, race, socioeconomic status are just a few.  Often, students at low-performing schools use the computers to remediate.  While, students at high-performing schools use the computers to create authentic technological products.  Is it fair that students at low-performing schools are not creating web sites or blogs as their opposites in high-performing schools are?  For students to be truly engaged, they should be using higher-order thinking skills, but students in low-performing schools are not getting that opportunity.  I currently teach at a Title I school with mainly minority students, and, as I think about the computer use in our classrooms, I am ashamed.  I might be contributing to this "digital divide."  We often use computers to drill students or teach remedial lessons.  I also feel like technology use is really implemented in math and science, but the literacy and fine arts areas do not use technology to develop higher-order thinking skills as often.  Is this also contributing to the "digital divide"?  Students interested in the fine arts and literacy areas might develop stronger technology skills in the long run if the technology was implemented in all areas of the classroom.

More often than not, technology programs fail.  Technology is often too much, too soon.  Just a few weeks ago, I was sitting in a staff meeting and we were discussing purchasing a new software program to better service our students.  While I was excited to be discussing technology as a staff, I was frustrated with the fact that we were considering the purchase of more software when we still haven't been appropriately trained how to use the other 20 or so programs that we are suppose to be using with our students on a daily basis.  As an Instructional Technology student, I whole-heartedly enjoy using technology in my classroom and learning about new ways to effectively implement technology, but, if I'm stressing out about another new technology program, then I know that other teachers are stressing too.  Not only do teachers need adequate time and support to fully understand how to implement new technology, but the principal needs to use the appropriate balance of leadership.  While the principal should not sit back and do nothing, he or she should also not take over completely without the support and input of the teachers and staff.  Outside experts can be used to supplement the principal's ideas and plans, but they should not be taking the place of the principal in developing an effective technology plan in a school.

While thinking about the school where I am currently employed, I am unaware of a technology plan that is currently in place.  Our school does currently have a school strategic plan and I am curious to know if technology is included on that plan.  I look forward to having conversations with my principal about the technology plan and where technology should be headed at our school.  Technology should be apart of school improvement and implemented cohesively with pedagogy and content as the TPACK model shows; therefore, technology, pedagogy, and content should be looked at in one piece versus separately when developing school improvement plans.  Strong technology plans should be simple and easy to read (avoiding technical jargon).  This is a huge relief to me as a future instructional technology facilitator as I am often frustrated by the confusing language or wording used when developing a school wide plan of action.

How can I use all of this new knowledge to develop a technology plan for my school?  "Digital divide." Staff Support.  Pedagogy.  Realistic.  Simple.  Cohesive.  It all seems a little complicated right now, but I firmly believe technology needs to be a part of school improvement and the first step is coming up with a game plan!

Free SMART Board Course!

I recently found this article that is offering a free, online SMART Board course!

It was really easy to get the course (you just have to send an e-mail that mentions the promotion) and I was sent the course within 24 hours of inquiring about the promotion. 

I haven't gone through the course yet, but it looked pretty interesting.  I'm hoping to learn something new and hone in on the skills I already have.  Also, you get a certificate of completion when done so that might be beneficial for the resume!

Here is the article if you are interested:
http://www.eschoolnews.com/2010/09/08/free-online-applied-smart-board-courses-available-from-blossom-learning/#utm_source=feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed

Thursday, September 9, 2010

I'm definitely getting an A in Algebra this year...

So, I just found this article (on my trusty Google Reader of course) about a group of middle school students in California that are each receiving iPads with an Algebra app that will be used to teach an Algebra course.  The app includes an electronic textbook (which really isn't all that exciting), but the program is interactive (which definitely is exciting).  Probably the best part about the whole thing, the teachers get iPads too!  Teachers are able to automatically access results through the program.  I will admit that I live, eat, and breathe for my iPhone so maybe I'm a little biased, but I'm just saying...who wouldn't try a little harder in Algebra if an iPad is involved!

Check out the article here:
http://www.presstelegram.com/news/ci_16025385
FYI....I originally found this article on eschoolnews.com but the full story is available at the URL above.

A few reflections...

Educational Technology, Integrating Technology, and Instructional Technology.  Just those words are making my head whirl around a little bit.  Who knew that they were three different things?  I do now!  Just taking baby steps to becoming the best Instructional Technology Facilitator that I can be! 

As I think back to all steps it took to get society and education to become technologically developed, I have to say that the real stand out moments are the invention of small desktop computers (think back to the 1970s) and the "Information Superhighway" aka the Internet.  While small desktops made it feasible to have computer-based instruction and learning in the classroom, the Internet took everything to the next level.  Not only are we talking instruction and an amazing resource, but now we are also talking about really convenient ways of communication. 

When I look back at my early school years, I vaguely remember the fight over the computer to play the infamous "Oregon Trail" game.  Did the computers at my school even have any other programs?  I'm not sure that the technology was being used as effectively as it could be.  Fast forward a few years, the Internet has really began to explode.  I remember using the Internet at home (rarely, of course, because it was so expensive!), but I don't think I used the Internet at school until high school.  At this point, I think many of my teachers may have been nervous to try out such "advanced" programs and technologies.     

Sure, technology is not the one and only end-all "cure" for our students out there.  Technology is about effective implementation that all students can benefit from in one way or another.  To successfully implement technology, teachers need to stay open-minded.  Easier said than done.  Some teachers don't like change.  Some teachers don't have time for change.  With everyday changing technology, this can be a problem.  As quoted in Educational Technology in Teaching, "Educators may not be able to predict the future of educational technology, but they know that it will be different from the present" (Roblyer 12).  Technology is and will continue to be ever changing.  Most importantly, students need teachers that are technologically literate, but, also, focused on the students.  Good technology cannot be implemented without good teachers.

So, we know that technology is great, but why are so many teachers still not jumping on board?  I think there are many reasons.  First, I think many educators are overwhelmed by technology.  What program should I use?  Which program is best?  What tools can I use to teach this?  How do I use this?  Teachers, in general, don't like to do things that they don't truly understand.  For some, there seems to be too many questions involved and not enough time to get all the answers.  Also, perhaps the biggest question of all, how will this really benefit my students?  Until teachers can see tangible results and proof, it is unlikely that they will take the time in the first place to use the variety of technology that is available.  It takes technology facilitators and leaders in a building to really encourage others to jump on board.  I hope that I can become that person in my school building.  Overwhelmingly, the lack of access to technology doesn't allow teachers to implement technology to the level that they would like to.  If the teacher doesn't have access to what they need, then it isn't possible for them to jump on board.  If the school systems aren't funding the equipment to provide technology in a classroom, then the teachers probably aren't going to buy into it either.

Maybe you are that teacher who is fighting technology-use in your classroom.  Here are a few reasons why technology should be integrated in your instruction: to gain attention from the students, to gain insight into the real world, to engage, to save time, and to help your students become technologically literate.  Honestly, the list could go on and go.  If that isn't convincing enough, I have to question whether every teacher is really doing the best they that can for their students.  Obviously, technology integration is a key aspect to being a successful teacher and helping your students become successful adults.

Technology doesn't come without its issues and technology integration is not always easy.  These economic times are rough.  It can frustrating to see a handful of coworkers being kicked to curb due to budget cuts while, all in the same day, fancy interactive white boards and new LCD projectors are being installed in every classroom in the county.  Forget that coworkers are kicked to curb, in some areas, music and art are being kicked to the curb also.  Can technology take precedence over the fine arts?  Somehow, a balance needs to be found.  Technology training and professional learning can be costly also, but, without the proper training, technology will not be used effectively by all.  Computers and Internet are often considered dangerous tools to be using in a classroom.  Students can stumble on inappropriate things.  Unprofessional employees can use the Internet or computers for inappropriate things as well.  I think this should be a non-issue.  Students and staff can easily be blocked from inappropriate websites as well as students can be taught the boundaries of computer use in their classrooms.  Teachers also have to set their priorities.  Often, this means that technology has to come behind teaching the standards and passing the standardized tests.  I firmly believe there is a way to merge technology with standards-based instruction and still get the students to pass those final tests.  It all requires a dedication to excellence in your classroom.  Some teachers bring up the Matthew Effect ("the rich get richer, the poor get poorer").  Students with low socioeconomic statuses don't have the same access to technology in their home lives as their opposites.  Therefore, all students need the opportunity to access technology within their school setting.  This ensures that every child can benefit from the use of technology regardless of technology use at home.  Overall, technology use can have its risk, but that doesn't grant any teacher to avoid the use of effective technology in their instruction and their classroom

Looking to the future, technology is taking on a bigger role in education and in most school buildings than it ever has.  Where I'm currently employed, there are several general-use computer labs as well as a media center lab.  Each classroom has a computer workstation consisting of at least 4 computers (Internet included) with a printer.  Teachers are each assigned their own laptops.  Students have access to laptops through a mobile lab that can be checked out by the teacher.  Each classroom has an LCD projector and SmartBoard interactive whiteboard.  Wireless networks are set up in the school to simplify Internet use.  We are currently going through the process of developing blogs for each classroom as well.  These are all technologies that are used on a daily basis through out our classrooms.  I would eventually like to see laptops become available to every student in a one-on-one ratio especially for use at school.  Imagine the endless possibilities if each and every student could access educational computer programs and Internet research right at their fingertips everyday.  Also, the students would benefit from the life long skills that would gain from daily computer use. 

For technology to be beneficial in schools, different criteria has to be met.  Everyone needs to be on the same page.  Staff members from all levels need to involved and open-minded and allowed professional development to improve technology use.  Technology has to support the standards and assessments.  Also, technology has to have boundaries with in a school setting to ensure safety and equity.  School systems have to have adequate funding and funding management as technology equipment is purchased.  On a final note, technology specialists need to be provided and on hand to support educators as technology problems occur.  As I review through these conditions, I am proud to say that the county that I work for meets all the necessary criteria and is taking the steps to integrate technology into every classroom.  I'm encouraged to implement technology in my classroom when I know that I'm being supported by the school district.

Thinking back to the reading I've done already, I am slowly starting to shape my vision for technology use in schools.  I actually feel motivated and inspired to really take my instruction to next level through technology (who knew a few chapters from some textbooks could be so life changing).  As I look at the comparisons between where my school's technology stands today versus where my school's technology use will stand in the future, I see the biggest gap in the technology literacy of the teachers.  I feel like the teachers have the access to the appropriate tools and equipment, but the real challenge lies in getting the teachers to actually use technology effectively and consistently.  While change can be difficult, it is a necessary component in developing balanced technologically influenced classrooms.  How can we can't from point A to point B?  I guess it's my job to figure that out!

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Class, Please Get Out Your Cell Phones For Our Next Assignment...

As surprising as it may be, most of my elementary aged students have cell phones and, on occasion, one of their phones will ring during the school day (You would be amazed at the inappropriate ring tones 4th graders will have).  Of course, if a cell phone does ring or I catch a student with a phone, it is immediately confiscated or taken away.   How fun would it be to encourage students to use cell phones as they are learning?  Looks like a school district in New Jersey is already doing that...

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/09/toms_river_verizon_collaborate.html